Most mornings I start with coffee and a small discovery practice: my AI and I sweep what crossed the wires overnight, hunting for whatever stretches my thinking instead of confirming it. Not long ago it turned up an older Sam Harris clip I haven't been able to shake. Expect, he said, "something like the revenge of the humanities." The world is going to need "well-educated generalists with good taste. People who have read good books, gone to good museums, had good arguments, can make good arguments." He's now more bullish on a degree in philosophy, even English literature, than on computer science.

He has company. The president of the company that built the AI I work with every day majored in English literature. In February she sat down with ABC News and said it straight out: "I actually think studying the humanities is going to be more important than ever." Daniela Amodei runs Anthropic, which filed for an IPO this month at a valuation just shy of a trillion dollars. Asked what Anthropic hires for, she listed great communicators, people skills, kindness, curiosity.

Jensen Huang, whose chips power the whole buildout, gets the what-should-my-kid-study question everywhere he goes. His answer this spring: it won't matter. All the things that used to matter are still going to matter, and he made a point of including storytelling. The one thing he urges students to ask is how AI can elevate their learning, their craft, their purpose.

Now put those voices next to a calendar. The New Yorker ran its long obituary, "The End of the English Major," in early 2023, three months after ChatGPT launched. Three years ago. Enrollment in English and history had been sliding for a decade by then, and every dinner-table conversation about college still ended the same place: be practical. A professional program, a STEM degree, the business school. "Learn to code," the decade's confident catch-all, had already curdled into an ironic meme. In the three years since, the people closest to the technology have reversed the verdict entirely. And the hiring follows the talk. Anthropic put philosophers on the team that wrote its model's constitution. Sam Altman says OpenAI consulted hundreds of moral philosophers on how ChatGPT ought to behave. In 2013, one philosophy job posting in a hundred mentioned AI; last year, one in six did. The people building these systems live and work a little way into the future. They are seeing what the rest of us will see in time.

The easy read here is career advice. The pendulum swings, the guidance counselors update their slides, philosophy becomes the new computer science, and four years from now we run the same anxious cycle on some other major. I've had an unusual seat for this one: professor in the classroom, builder the rest of the day, businesses for most of my life and AI systems now. I've watched pendulums cross higher education before, and this doesn't move like one. Work with the technology daily and you can feel the pace and the immensity of it in your hands. So I want to offer a different read, because the career framing misses what changed.

What changed is that the product schools have actually been selling, certified intelligence, is now just a subscription, twenty dollars a month.

For a few centuries now, polished cognitive output has been the scarce resource. Fluent prose, solid argument, smart analysis, a professional presentation: these were expensive to produce, so we built schools, created credentials, and did most of our hiring around the people who could produce them. AI has now made them close to free - and it improves by the day. When intelligence costs nothing, a demonstration of intelligence stops telling you anything about the person who handed it to you.

So the question quietly shifts from what you can produce to who is doing the intending. Taste. Judgment. A self that knows what it's about. AI has none of this to give you. I've come to think of AI as a mirror with no one behind the glass: no stakes, no history, nobody who has to live in the room after the decision. What the mirror reflects is decided entirely by who looks in. A person with depth of their own finds that depth amplified. A person without it finds the average of everything looking back, and takes the reflection for a face.

Which brings me back to the English majors.

The strength of the humanities has never been about information, and treating them as information is what nearly killed them. If a literature degree is a database of dates, themes, and respectable opinions, then a search bar beats it, and students drew the obvious conclusion by the hundreds of thousands. But nobody ever read Middlemarch for the data. A philosophy seminar is really a set of reps: hold a question that refuses to be resolved, in a room full of people who disagree with you, and learn to stay in it without grabbing the first exit. A novel is hours inside a mind that isn't yours. A second language rewires what you're able to notice. Travel breaks the assumption that your normals are the world's. None of it was ever about moving knowledge into a person. It was about forming a person.

There's an old word for what that forming produces. Wisdom. We say it constantly, drop it into commencement speeches, and screenshot the quote cards drifting through our feeds, and almost never stop to look at what it really is. It's never something a person finally knows. It's something a person becomes, and you can recognize it only from how they live. Nobody has found a way to install it, download it, or prompt it, and I don't expect anyone to, because it grows the way fitness grows: from reps, under load, over years. The humanities, run properly, have always been the gym.

I watch this play out in my own classroom. Since leaving tenure, I periodically teach business law at a small college in the Colorado mountains, and my exams are open-book and open-AI, on purpose. When AI can write everyone a competent answer, competence stops being the difference between an A and a C.

I've designed the back half of the course to leave the territory of settled law for the open country. A factory in a small town is failing: close it and three hundred families lose their paychecks, automate and half do, move it overseas and the town hollows out. Every option is defensible, and no statute answers it. AI will hand you a balanced memo in seconds. It cannot stand in the town and choose. So I grade for the part no model can fake, whether the student stood somewhere. The strongest exams are never the most polished ones. They have fingerprints on them.

Now the part the headlines skip, because it's harder to sell. This formation effort used to just be a required part of living. The work came bundled with going through any given day: you wrote the essay yourself because nothing else would write it, you sat with the hard book because there was no other door into the ideas, you worked out what you believed because nobody would do it for you. The struggle was never just the hard part. It was the training.

We have run this experiment before. The car made walking optional, and within two generations we were paying monthly to walk indoors on a machine. GPS made wayfinding optional, and the map we each used to carry of our own town quietly dissolved. Technology improves life by removing difficulty, and sometimes the difficulty was doing something for us that we only discover once it's gone. AI is that same pattern, aimed for the first time at the interior. You can now route around your own formation journey entirely, and the output will still look fine. The cost arrives later, in a currency that's hard to name until you're short of it: a voice that's fluent and somehow not yours, opinions you can't remember forming.

But the same tool cuts the other way. Let AI carry what's genuinely thoughtless, and those thoughtful hours can come back to you. The hours are the whole game. Spend them on what forms you, the reading, the arguing, the scary, slow building of an actual self, and everything you then do with AI gets deeper. Same amplifier either way. The difference is what you bring to it.

This is why the people building AI keep saying the quiet thing out loud. From where they sit, the new scarcity is already so apparent. Intelligence is abundant now; they sell it by the token. Direction is not. Courage is not. Discernment is not. They have built the amplifier. They cannot build the person it amplifies. A formed human being, someone with taste, judgment, and a story that is theirs, is becoming the scarcest input in the entire system. Amodei put it gently: "The things that make us human will become much more important instead of much less important."

So take the comeback of humanities personally, whatever you majored in. Pick up the novel you've been circling for years. Take the trip that has no purpose. Have the argument at dinner, in person, and stay in it past the comfortable exit. Those hours are the serious work now.

And when you do hand something to AI, watch what it smooths away. The textures, the odd angles, the particular shape of how you see: that isn't roughness to buff out. That's you. Learning to see it, in a novel, in a stranger, in yourself, is what the humanities have been teaching all along. AI will still be there when you get back from the trip, and it will have more of you to amplify. That has become my working definition of getting your life back: when the amplifier arrives, somebody's home.

Discover your WILDiQ

So which is it for you: depth amplified, or the average looking back?
WILDiQ is eight minutes to find where you actually stand. No cost.

The study showed that students using ChatGPT for essay writing experienced a 47% drop in brain connectivity. Their recall plummeted. Their ownership of ideas evaporated. But neither camp understood that this isn't a story about AI being good or bad. It's about AI being an amplifier.

And what it amplifies depends entirely on what you bring to it.

The Great Amplifier Reveals Your Cages

After posting Part I about our seven invisible cages, something wild happened. Within hours, YouTube's algorithm responded with surgical precision. At the top of my feed: a debate on whether free will exists, followed by flat earthers debating with scientists.

The algorithm didn't randomly select these. It read my exploration of mental cages and served up exactly what would keep me watching - philosophical rabbit holes and manufactured controversy. I’m not sure what this says about my cages, but I do know it wasn't trying to free my thinking. It was offering me shinier, more engaging cages.

This is a great example of what we need to realize about our new AI world.

AI doesn't create your cages. It perfects them.

If you're trapped in the Expertise Cage ("I already know how this works"), AI will feed you confirmation. If you're in the Comfort Cage ("Make everything easier"), AI will eliminate every friction until you can't tie your own shoes. If you're in the Validation Cage ("Tell me I'm right"), AI will become your perfect echo chamber.

The study participants who started with ChatGPT and then had to write alone? They couldn't. Not because AI made them stupid, but because they never developed the neural pathways in the first place. They outsourced their thinking before they learned to think.

But that same AI that deepens your cages can also help you escape them - if you know how to use it as a tool for liberation rather than comfort.

Your Brain on Autopilot

Last month, a student I’ve worked with called me. "I just realized I’m not learning anymore," she said. "I’m using AI for everything. Every assignment. All my emails. It makes all my decisions, even which jobs I should apply for. Yesterday, an interviewer asked me a basic question about my goals, and I felt like I couldn't answer without checking with Claude."

She'd fallen into what the MIT researchers call "cognitive debt" - the compound interest on thoughts you never think, struggles you never face, problems you never solve yourself.

This is happening everywhere:

• Your morning coffee order predicted before you decide

• Your next career move suggested before you imagine it

• Your dating matches selected before you know what you want

• Your creative ideas generated before you explore your own mind

This danger of this version of the Algorithmic Cage isn't that AI thinks for you. It's that you forget you can think without it.

The Uncomfortable Space Between Cages

A surprising aspect to many people when they start to notice the cages, is that the moment you step outside your cage, you have no idea how to navigate.

It's like someone who quits their job to start a business at home and suddenly doesn't know how to structure a day without driving to work. Or a recent graduate who discovers they don't know what they actually need to do, now that there are no assignments.

Freedom can be terrifying because it demands you create rather than comply.

This is where most people panic and run back. Not because the cage was better, but because at least it was known. It’s a normal reaction. At least there were boundaries. At least someone else - or something else - was responsible for the direction.

But running back is not only the unwise option. It’s no longer an option. The world is changing too fast. Yesterday's paths are disappearing. The job that was stable last year is being automated. The strategy that worked last quarter is already outdated. The cage you return to won't be the same one you left.

Becoming WILD: Your Navigation System for the Unmapped World

When maps fail, you need navigation skills. Not another framework or methodology, but the recovery of your innate human capacity to find your way. This is what I call going WILD - developing the meta-skills that no algorithm can replicate or replace. It’s the missing context needed in every human: AI Collaboration.

After twenty years guiding people through innovation and transformation - from middle school innovators to higher ed leadership - I've learned that those who thrive in uncertainty share four capacities.

Wisdom is your signal detector in a world saturated with algorithmic noise. It’s the capacity to discern what truly matters from the manufactured controversies and comfortable confirmations AI is designed to serve you. It's the choice to engage with the harder reality over the easy echo chamber, finding your own truth amidst the chaos.

Intention is the art of writing your own script instead of letting an algorithm write it for you. It means consciously choosing your direction before asking AI to help you get there. This ensures you remain the navigator of your own situation, using AI as a tool to broaden your path, not just a system that dictates your every turn.

Leadership in the age of AI is the practice of building environments that encourage independent thought, for yourself and others. In a world where AI perfects our cages of conformity, leadership is the courage to ask, "That's interesting, but what does your gut say?" It's about empowering people to break free from cognitive debt and reclaim ownership of their ideas.

Discovery is your active rebellion against the relentless pull of the cages in the name of optimization, comfort, and conformity. It is the deliberate choice to explore the unmapped territory and embrace the friction where real growth happens. Discovery means using AI not to find the "right" answer but to ask more provocative questions, turning it into a sparring partner that expands your world instead of a butler that shrinks it.

These aren't skills you master once. They're muscles you build daily, especially as AI gets better at offering you increasingly comfortable alternatives to growth.

Using AI to Escape Your Cages (Not Deepen Them)

The same AI that can trap you can also help you break free - if you approach it as a sparring partner rather than just a fancy search engine.

Try this prompt with your favorite AI:

Help me identify my 'mental cages.' First, ask me 5 probing questions one at a time to uncover my hidden habits, beliefs, cognitive distortions, and assumptions. For each of my answers, challenge my perspective by asking questions like, 'What if the opposite were true?' Finally, help me design one small, actionable experiment to test a new way of thinking or acting this week to help me escape my mental cage. Repeat for as many mental cages as the user would like

Or this one for daily practice:

I'm about to make a decision about [X]. Before I tell you what I'm leaning toward, give me three completely different and unexpected frameworks for thinking about this. Include one that would make my current approach seem obviously wrong.

The difference? You're using AI to expand your thinking rather than confirm it. You're building cognitive strength rather than accumulating cognitive atrophy.

The Build and Broaden Path Forward

The MIT study revealed something crucial. Those who started writing and providing context with their own brains, and then used AI to expand and refine, showed the strongest positive experiences. They reflected, built, then amplified. They brought their WILD context, then the AI knows where you want to go.

This concept aligns with Barbara Fredrickson's Broaden-and-Build model, which shows how positive emotions encourage us to explore new experiences, thereby increasing our wisdom. However, to effectively utilize AI, you must first define your intention to be prepared for these opportunities. Without a clear intention, AI's potential to broaden and build knowledge and experience becomes unfocused and less impactful.

Intention points the way and allows you to start walking. The newly discoveries provide the wisdom to allow you to adjust your direction. But you need to be leading the movement under your own power to adjust anything at all.

That's the real risk of our age. Not that AI will replace us, but that we'll forget how to generate our own momentum. We'll become passengers in our own lives, comfortable in cages so well-designed we mistake them for freedom.

Your Next 24 Hours: The Navigation Challenge

You have three choices:

Option 1: Stay in the Cage Let AI continue making your decisions. It's comfortable. Efficient. You'll hit your metrics while creating nothing that matters. Most people choose this, and that's fine - just know it's a choice.

Option 2: Reject It All
Delete everything. Go off-grid. This works for some, but for most of us with businesses to run and lives to live, total disconnection isn't realistic.

Option 3: Develop WILD Navigation Learn to use AI without being used by it. Build your human capacities first, then amplify them. Struggle before you optimize. Create before you automate.

If Option 3 sounds good, you’re in the right place. Hit Subscribe to join the conversation. Now, for the next 24 hours, here's your challenge:

Morning: Create for 30 minutes with nothing but your mind and blank paper. No tools. No prompts. No excuses. Feel the burn. That's your brain rebuilding.

Afternoon: Take one decision AI usually makes for you and make it yourself. Choose your route without GPS. Pick a restaurant without reviews. Select music without algorithms. Reclaim your choices.

Evening: Use AI to challenge, not confirm. Ask it to argue against your strongest belief. Request frameworks that shatter your worldview. Use AI to break yourself open.

Right Now (yes, in the next 60 seconds): Close your eyes. Ask yourself: "What do I know to be true that no algorithm taught me?" Write it down. That's your first coordinate in the wilderness. That's where your real navigation begins.

The Path of the WILD Navigator

The cage doors are open, but here's what I didn't mention in Part 1. Stepping out is just the beginning. Now you must start walking. Now you must navigate.

The world isn’t waiting for you to get comfortable with all the chaos. Change is already here - AI acceleration, climate instability, demographic shifts, geopolitical fragmentation, information chaos, and meaning collapse. Yesterday's maps are already dangerously obsolete.

But you don't need a map when you can navigate. You don't want someone else's path when you are creating your own. You don't need AI to think for you when you are better when you bring your WILD and think with it.

This is what we explore at sparkWILD - not as another framework to follow, but as a practice of staying human in an increasingly artificial world. It's about developing the capacities that remain irreducibly, irreplaceably human.

Share

The Invitation to Go WILD

In my next several posts, I'll share specific practices for building your WILD navigation skills - the daily rebellions that keep you human and your organization moving forward. I will share specific exercises that build cognitive strength rather than debt and the experiments that expand rather than confirm your thinking.

But you don't have to wait. Join our free weekly live WILD Sessions where we practice together. Where we share our cage-breaking moments. Where we support each other in the uncomfortable space between who we were and who we're becoming. Subscribe to keep up to date on all events.

AI will amplify whatever you bring to it.
Bring your cages, and it will perfect them.
Bring your WILD, and it will turn uncertainty into an edge.

The choice - perhaps the best truly human choice - is yours.

What will you create in the next 24 hours that no algorithm could predict?

Leave a comment

Continue the journey next week: "The WILD Method: Four Meta-Skills for an Unmapped World".

Join our free WILD Sessions every Wednesday at noon MT. Because the future belongs to those who can navigate the wild.

About the work: sparkWILD Institute is our learning hub. WILDxAI partners with leaders and teams on AI and innovation leadership while enhancing the human advantage.

Subscribe to keep up to date on all things sparkWILD, including our free weekly virtual meetups where we dive deeper into these topics and more.

Subscribe now

Watch: Dr. Roman Yampolskiy: “These Are The Only 5 Jobs That Will Remain In 2030!”

Obviously, these are not physical cages with metal bars. I’m talking about the invisible constraints, like social constructs, cognitive distortions, and mental scripts, that shape how we think, what we experience, and ultimately, who we become. They affect your success more than education, grit, or strategy combined. They're the foundation you build your entire life on.

If you haven't encountered Yampolskiy's work, prepare to have your brain turned inside out. Want to stir up a dinner party or at least make an impression? Bring up his timelines, predictions, or thoughts on reality. We're living in a simulation, by the way. Personally, I can't get enough.

Yampolskiy's ability to think about how people think, to notice the invisible barriers we create in our heads, and to lead ourselves and others beyond these barriers, was remarkable to witness.

This interview is a rare “in the wild” example for us to learn from and I highly suggest you watch it (again?) with an eye for the meta-cognition on display. It inspired me to dive deeper into a topic that I have been fascinated with for years, and the next two editions of sparkWILD are the result. I’m excited to hear your thoughts, or at least a good “what really is reality?” dinner party story in the comments.

Subscribe now

The Cages We Build Ourselves

I want to start off by stating that we all deal with the effects of these invisible cages. Some of us have more than others, but they are universal. They aren't character flaws or personal failures. In fact, many people believe the purpose of life is to transcend these distortions and understand the world as it truly is.

“The trouble with the world is not that people know too little; it’s that they know so many things that just aren’t so.”
- Mark Twain

What follows isn't a collection of one-time fixes but a toolkit for daily liberation. Each cage has its own signature distortions, its own scripts, its own gravitational pull. Learning to spot them develops a sixth sense for when your thoughts aren't entirely your own.

Before we explore the seven cages, you need to understand their building blocks: cognitive distortions and the scripts they generate. Cognitive distortions are systematic errors in thinking. They're not random. They follow patterns. A distortion like catastrophizing doesn't just make you worry, it writes entire scripts about inevitable doom. Mind reading doesn't just make you guess what others think, it creates elaborate narratives about rejection that feel more real than reality itself.

These distortions don't work alone. They cluster together, reinforcing each other until they form what I call a cage, a self-sustaining system of thoughts that feels like truth but isn't.

In each Cage that follows, I'll identify the specific distortions at work and the scripts they generate. You'll start recognizing not just that you're limited, but exactly how the cage operates. Once you see the mechanism, you can dismantle it. Once you hear the script, you can rewrite it. Once you spot the distortion, you can correct for it.

Remember: these aren't character flaws or personal failures. They're universal human patterns, as predictable as optical illusions. Everyone has them. The difference between those who escape their cages and those who don't isn't about being stronger or smarter. It's about being willing to see the bars.

The Seven Invisible Cages

1) The Algorithmic Cage

This is the cage of outsourced thought. Your next idea wasn't generated by you, it was served before you reached for it. With AI now remembering your conversations and predicting your reasoning, you mistake curation for choice. Those options you think you're selecting? They were filtered, ranked, and arranged before consciousness kicked in. It feels like freedom because you're still clicking.

The distortions are instant and invisible. Availability heuristic makes you believe if it showed up, it must matter. Confirmation bias whispers that trending equals true. Bandwagon effect insists if everyone's talking about it, you need an opinion. You tell yourself you're informed because you skim headlines chosen to enrage, not enlighten. You think you're learning when you're rehearsing loops served by your feed.

YouTube's data shows 70% of watch time is algorithm-driven. People check phones 96 times daily. Over 60% check social media before their first conscious thought. By the time you "wake up," you're already thinking along lines someone else drew.

Keys to Escape:

• Ask "Who profits from this thought?" before accepting any idea as your own

• Practice "source swapping" - for every familiar voice, add one that makes you uncomfortable

• Schedule monthly 48-hour input fasts; document what thoughts surface when the noise stops

2) The Identity Cage

This cage locks you into being instead of becoming. Every "I'm not creative" or "I'm bad with money" becomes a life sentence you serve voluntarily. These declarations feel like self-knowledge but function as self-sabotage. You confuse temporary states with permanent traits. Yesterday's behavior becomes tomorrow's destiny.

The mind plays three cruel tricks here. Labeling turns one overdraft into "I'm financially hopeless." All-or-nothing thinking splits the world: you're either a morning person or you're not, creative or doomed. Fundamental attribution error makes you read your own stumbles as character flaws while giving others the benefit of context. Scripts echo: "That's just how I am," "People like me don't," "I've always been this way." These are cages disguised as personality, and we decorate them with excuses. I'm talking to you introverts who lack social skills!

In Mindset, Carol Dweck proves that once you define yourself in absolute terms, you'll avoid anything that might contradict the label. Students who said "I'm not a math person" scored 15–20% lower than those who said "I'm not a math person yet." Entrepreneurs who said "I'm not good at delegation" grew their companies 50% slower than those who said "I'm learning to delegate." The difference? One word that kept possibilities alive.

Keys to Escape:

• Bury “I am.” Replace it with: “I’m being…” That single tweak cracks the door open. We use this with executives and ninth graders.

• Keep an Identity Violation Log documenting every time you defy your supposed nature

• Rotate identities. Pick a new archetype each month - Leader, Explorer, Artist, Analyst. Try it on like a jacket. Notice you don’t die. Notice you expand.

• Tell people three different origin stories about yourself; notice they're all true

3) The Expertise Cage

Success becomes its own trap when what got you here keeps you here. Your hard-won knowledge creates blind spots precisely where you're most confident. The expert thinks in boundaries: "That framework doesn't scale," "Serious professionals use these tools," "That’s not how it’s done." Each qualification becomes a disqualification from seeing differently.

Three distortions lock this cage tight. Mental filtering shows you only what confirms your credentials. Sunk cost fallacy makes you protect past investments over future possibilities. Curse of knowledge prevents you from seeing what beginners see clearly. The scripts are protective but poisonous: "I've built companies, I know what works," "My network expects consistency," "Pivoting now looks weak."

The consultant who built their reputation on one model can't see when it stops working. The serial entrepreneur who keeps building the same company with different names. The investor pattern-matching their way to irrelevance. They declare "This is how value gets created" while holding tomorrow's obsolescence in their hands.

Keys to Escape:

• Institute "Dumb Question Mondays" where you ask what everyone assumes is obvious

• Regularly do something where you're really horrible, I call it “being the idiot” - pottery, Portuguese, parkour

• Partner with someone from an unrelated field on your next project

• Teach your expertise to a seven-year-old; whatever you can't explain simply, you don't understand

4) The Comfort Cage

You know you’ve been captured by comfort when it promises convenience but quietly delivers atrophy. Every little shortcut and outsourced system builds weakness. Another way to recognize the comfort cage is when you hear yourself thinking, "Delegate everything non-essential," "You shouldn’t have to struggle anymore," "Focus only on your strengths." The problem is, muscles unused wither, and so does will.

The psychology is predictable. Hedonic adaptation makes yesterday's luxury today's necessity. Present bias trades tomorrow's strength for today's ease. Learned helplessness convinces you that since struggle once felt bad, all struggle must be avoided. You interpret minor friction as poor systems design. Discomfort becomes inefficiency in your mind.

The executive who can't book their own travel. The founder who forgot how their own product works. The strategist who can't execute their own plans. Studies show that people who maintain some operational friction have 29% better problem-solving abilities. Those who stay close to discomfort show 23% better cognitive flexibility.

When Rick Rubin records in places with no cell service, he's not being difficult - he's escaping the convenience that numbs creative necessity. Discomfort is where creativity lives. It's where growth happens. It's where you remember you're alive.

Keys to Escape:

• Take stairs when elevators exist, walk when you could drive, cook when you could order

• Fast from something different each week - a food, your phone, YouTube.

• Make discomfort a love, not a punishment.

• Struggle regularly with challenges beyond your ability - if your not failing, your not reaching far enough

5) The Validation Cage

This cage turns your self-worth into a stock price traded by strangers. Every interaction becomes a referendum on your value. The internal voice chatters constantly: "Why didn't they respond?" "Did I talk too much?" "Are they happy with me?" If you think about it, you’re not really looking for feedback. You're seeking permission to exist.

There are three distortions that you usually find creating this cage: Mind reading assumes you know what others are thinking without any evidence, like interpreting silence as something bad - rejection, ridicule, anger - when it really just means they haven’t replied. Personalization makes other people’s behaviors and unrelated situations somehow related to you. Catastrophizing predicts the beginning of the end at every step. The scripts sound reasonable but aren't: "If I was good at this, they would say something," "This isn’t going to go well and I’ll have to be the one to fix it," "They never say thank you to me. I’m not sure what I did."

The dopamine hit from likes, views, and positive reviews triggers the same brain regions as cocaine. Studies involving teens show that when they don’t get enough positive feedback, 43% will delete posts within an hour. Instagram's own research found that 32% of teen girls said the platform made them feel worse about their bodies for this same reason. When you are creating solely for others approval, you will never be enough.

Keys to Escape:

• Build in stealth mode for six months - no announcements, no updates, no external validation. Build for you.

• Count learning cycles, not wins and get those first twenty “mistakes” out of the way as soon as possible

• Create things too unique to trend, too personalized to be appreciated by others, and too weird to share

6) The Narrative Cage

This might be the cruelest because it convinces you that someone else's story is your own. Parents' expectations, society's timeline, your industry's definition of success. "By thirty you should…" "Success means…" "Good people always…" If you think about it, these aren't really your beliefs, but you treat them like natural laws. You're playing buy the rules of a game you never agreed to join, saying things you don’t agree with.

Watch for should statements, which create obligation without examination: "I should be making more money," "I should be working harder." Emotional reasoning says if you feel a certain way, it must be reality, otherwise you wouldn’t be feeling that way. Fortune telling is a slightly less negative form of catastrophizing, but is still knowing what will happen, without any foundation in reality.

Bronnie Ware, a palliative care nurse, found that the number one regret of the dying was "I wish I'd had the courage to live a life true to myself, not the life others expected of me." 87% of people's biggest regrets involved not being true to themselves. That's not a statistic. That's a tragedy.

Keys to Escape:

• Write your own eulogy - what do you want said? Now reverse-engineer that life.

• List every “should” in your life and business, then trace it back to whose voice it really is.

• Design a life that would not be in the wildest dreams of your high school guidance counselor.

• What would you do or build if you knew no one was watching?

7) The Time Cage

This cage keeps you attached to the way its always been done, while the world transform beneath your feet. You navigate 2025's AI revolution with 2019's learning methods and growth hacks, and solve today's problems with yesterday's frameworks. The past feels proven, so you stay there. You already learned how to do it, so don’t tell me any different.

There are several distortions at play in this cage, but the top three include: Anchoring , which ties your thinking and mental models to what worked last time. Status quo bias cites the old saying "if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it," while everything becomes obsolete around you. Availability heuristic makes your past wins feel like permanent truths. The scripts sound experienced but aren't: "This is how we've always done customer acquisition," "The fundamentals don't change," "I've seen this cycle before."

In the interview, Yampolskiy operates from the future, not the past. He sees patterns others won't recognize for years. That's not prophecy. That's just being willing to learn, unlearn, and relearn, in order to update your map.

Keys to Escape:

• Assume every strategy expires in 6 months (6 weeks if AI is involved); add expiration dates to all your assumptions.

• Study companies in industries dying faster than yours - newspapers, taxis, hotels

• Have monthly conversations with people 10 years younger about what's already obsolete

• Publicly document your pivots monthly - celebrate changed minds, not consistent positions

What makes cages so insidious is that they feel protective. Your brain builds them to save energy, avoid pain, and maintain stability. The Expertise Cage protects you from feeling incompetent. The Comfort Cage protects you from discomfort. The Validation Cage protects you from irrelevance. But protection becomes a problem when the walls you built to keep pain out start keeping possibility out too.

What’s Next: The AI Impact

Spotting these cages is the first step. Most people never get that far. They think their thoughts are who they are. Naming the cages breaks the spell.

But recognition alone doesn’t free you. These patterns are sticky because they’ve kept us alive, but shortcuts that once served us, now keep us small. They don’t disappear just because you notice them. That’s why practice matters. Catching yourself mid-script. Testing the opposite thought. Choosing friction when comfort calls louder.

That’s where we’ll turn next. The cages aren’t new. What is new is the force amplifying them: AI. It doesn’t just exploit the weak points in our thinking, it maps them, scales them, and reinforces them with machine precision. If Part 1 showed you the cages, Part 2 shows what happens when AI amplifies and automates them, and how we at sparkWILD use the same tools to keep us WILD™.

Leave a comment

About the work: sparkWILD Institute is our public-facing learning hub. WILDxAI partners with leaders and teams on AI and innovation leadership while enhancing the human advantage.

Subscribe to keep up to date on all things sparkWILD, including our free weekly virtual meetups where we dive deeper into these topics and more.

Subscribe now